Skip to main content

Table 1 RDCRN consortium-patient advocacy group partnership survey response

From: The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network

Survey question: what impact has your (associated) PAG(s) had with your RDCRN consortium activities in each of the following areas?

Consortium PIs (N = 17)

PAGs (N = 28)

 

Engage in activity (%)

Mean

Median

Engage in activity (%)

Mean

Median

Research

      

Review protocols and provide substantive input on study design

14 (82)

4.2

5

21 (75)

4.5

5

Review study forms and other study related documents

16 (94)

4.3

4

19 (68)

4.6

5

Participate in Consortium conference calls

16 (94)

4.6

5

25 (89)

4.7

5

Attend Consortium investigator meetings

16 (94)

4.8

5

21 (75)

4.8

5

Help with patient recruitment for RDCRN studies

16 (94)

4.7

5

24 (86)

4.5

5

Provide logistical support for Consortium meetings, calls, etc.

14 (82)

4.2

4.5

18 (64)

4.3

5

Provide administrative support to Consortium

14 (82)

3.8

3.5

14 (50)

4.3

4.5

Communication/Outreach

      

Contribute to Consortium website design and content

14 (82)

4.5

5

22 (79)

3.9

4

Include Consortium activities, updates or relevant sessions at PAG meetings

17 (100)

4.7

5

24 (86)

4.6

5

Communicate Consortium activities within the patient community through website, newsletters, etc.

17 (100)

4.8

5

27 (96)

4.7

5

Provide educational materials related to Consortium activities for patient community

15 (88)

4.9

5

23 (82)

4.6

5

Funding

      

Provide direct funding to the Consortium

13 (76)

4.5

5

16 (57)

4.3

5

Provide funding support for Consortium meetings/activities

14 (82)

4.4

5

18 (64)

4.1

4

Provide partial or full funding for Consortium trainees

12 (71)

4.2

4.5

13 (46)

4.2

4

Provide in-kind support (not necessarily funding) for Consortium activities (e.g., mailings, office staff, other)

14 (82)

4.4

4

17 (61)

4.4

5

  1. RDCRN Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network, PIs principal investigators, PAG patient advocacy group
  2. Scale: 1 = very negative, 2 = somewhat negative, 3 = no impact, 4 = somewhat positive, 5 = very positive. N total number of Consortium PIs or PAGs that participated in the survey