Skip to main content

Table 2 Oral health impact profile questionnaire for different types of OI

From: The impact of osteogenesis imperfecta severity on oral health-related quality of life in Spain: a cross-sectional study

OHRQoL

Number of items

Possible range

Observed range

Type I

nā€‰=ā€‰20

mean (SD)

Type IV

nā€‰=ā€‰30

mean (SD)

Type III

nā€‰=ā€‰14

mean (SD)

Total

nā€‰=ā€‰64

mean (SD)

OHIP-total

14

0ā€“56

4ā€“51

13.8 [6]

21.4 [12] a

23 [10] b

19.4 (10.8)

OR (CI)

-

-

-

1

1.7(0.3ā€“10)

31 (2-445)*

-

Functional limitation

2

0ā€“8

0ā€“6

0.6 (0.8)

1,5 (1.6)

1,9 (1.5) c

1,3 (1.4)

OR (CI)

-

-

-

1

2 (0.4ā€“10)

15 (1.3ā€“185)*

-

Physical pain

2

0ā€“8

0ā€“8

2.7 (1.5)

3.4 [2]

3.9 (1.7) d

3.3 (1.9)

OR (CI)

-

-

-

1

1,2(0.2-7)

āˆž*

-

Psychological discomfort

2

0ā€“8

0ā€“8

4.4 (1.5)

5 [2]

5.5 (1.9) e

5 (1.9)

OR (CI)

-

-

-

1

3(0.5ā€“22)

16 (1.6ā€“170)*

-

Physical disability

2

0ā€“8

0ā€“8

1 [1]

2.7 [2, 3]f

3 [1, 9]g

2,4 [2]

OR (CI)

-

-

-

1

5(0.5ā€“53)

59(2.8ā€“1246)*

-

Psychological disability

2

0ā€“8

0ā€“8

2,5 [1, 4]

3.4 [2, 4]

4 (2.4) h

3.2 (2.1)

OR (CI)

-

-

-

1

2(0.4ā€“10)

21(1.7ā€“258)*

-

Social disability

2

0ā€“8

0ā€“8

1 [1]

2.7 [2]i

2 (1.9) j

2 (1.9)

Ā 

-

-

-

1

0.2(0.18-2)

*

-

OR (CI)

7,80

11,40

16,33*

0,05

Ā Ā Ā 

Handicap

2

0ā€“8

0ā€“8

1 (1.4)

2,4 (1.9) k

2 [2]

2 (1.9)

OR (CI)

-

-

-

1

0.5(0.1-2)

2(0.3ā€“12)*

-

  1. Statistical analysis: The Kruskalā€’Wallis test was used. The results were confirmed by the Mannā€’Whitney U test (nonparametric test). The results are shown as the n or means (SDs). OR (CI)ā€‰=ā€‰odds ratio (95% confidence interval). *Statistically significant findings at pā€‰<ā€‰0.05
  2. a) pā€‰=ā€‰0,026 for OI type IV compared to OI type I
  3. b) pā€‰=ā€‰0,007 for OI type III compared to OI type I
  4. c) pā€‰=ā€‰0,010 for OI type III compared to OI type I
  5. d) pā€‰=ā€‰0,042 for OI type III compared to OI type I
  6. e) Pā€‰=ā€‰0,016 for OI type III compared to OI type I
  7. f) pā€‰=ā€‰0,034 for OI type IV compared to OI type I
  8. g) pā€‰=ā€‰0,002 for OI type III compared to OI type I
  9. h) Pā€‰=ā€‰0,035 for OI type III compared to OI type I
  10. i) Pā€‰=ā€‰0,003 for OI type IV compared to OI type I
  11. j) Pā€‰=ā€‰0,043 for OI type III compared to OI type I
  12. k) Pā€‰=ā€‰0,018 for OI type IV compared to OI type I